Skip to main content

Tutankhamun's Pectoral represents Mars


sun-planatary-chaos-mars-earth
One of the birth names given to Mars was Tutankhamun. The pectoral below spells Tutankhamun's throne name Neb-Khepru-Re. This translates as 'The Lordly Manifestation of the Sun.'
With the GKS we've no need to twist or contort or demote such a title as belonging to a weird world we don't understand, we simple take it at face value!
The sun in ancient times appeared as a red orb and Mars numerous times also appeared as a red orb, so what we have here is Mars/Tutankhamun literally ‘the image or manifestation of the sun.' It is the very reason why the divine astral monarchy also adorned the ubiquitous title sa re which translates as 'son of the sun.' All planetary bodies as they moved back and forth to earth in the guise of godly kings and queens were naturally deemed as offspring of Re, one of the original creator gods.

Tutankhamun Egyptian Pharaoh as the Planet Mars

tutankhamun-Khephri-scarab-pectoral-marstut's-scarab-mars-pectoral-treasureThe illustrations below show the effect of the solar wind (charged particles) on earth's magnetosphere and although these electrical currents are invisible if we were to throw in a little dust and debris these electrical ‘loops and tails' would be rendered completely visible. An analogy would be effect of this electricity when entering earth's North and South Pole - the Aurora Borealis or northern and southern lights. These shimmering neon lights appear in different colours and shapes (rays, glows, curtains and pulsating patches) and are the result of charged particles reacting with the earth's atmosphere.
With Tutankhamun's pectoral I am suggesting that this beautifully crafted brooch came about as a direct result of physical observations of Mars in close proximity to earth being bombarded by the solar wind.
sun-plasma-solar-wind-auroraIn other words there was no ‘art for arts sake,' the Egyptians crafted EXACTLY what they saw! No pseudo surreal world of make believe as most would have us believe; no inventing of a invisible fictitious god to explain the motion of the sun (Re) across the sky (he had a boat of ‘millions of years' for this!), just a very real world dominated by cosmic chaos.
Mars/Tutankhamun bombarded by the solar wind and in doing so manifesting the shape of a gigantic blue coloured winged beetle in its wake. Dust and volatiles granting otherwise invisible electrical phenomena complete visibility in the shape of a winged beetle.
The Egyptians may have been naive but they were not stupid. This is the reason why the sacred scarab Khephri was known as “he who is come into being.” A deity who self-created himself seemingly from nothing; a god who self-created himself numerous times over as the solar wind reacted with planetary bodies when moving back and forth to earth in the guise of god kings and queens.
During the reign of Amenhotep III (Mars) unusually large scarabs were produced en-mass. This is no coincidence and further corroborates the GKS. Amenhotep III was a guise of Mars (as were all pharaohs called Amenhotep) and this is a time just prior to the birth of Mercury from Mars or in Egyptian terms, a time prior to the Amarna period and the exaltation of the Aten.
Let me make this very clear, the so-called Aten or ‘disk of the sun' has nothing at all to do with the sun, this is a ridiculous notion. To suggest the Egyptians up and renamed their pre-eminent sun god Re as the Aten shows a poor understanding of ancient minds - the Aten was originally the core of Mars, or as we now call it the planet Mercury. It was literally sucked out through the Valles Marineris (sun-solar-wind-aurora-marsenormous gash still visible on the surface of mars) sometime in the 7th century BC as a result of repeated encounters with earth. This was the beginning of the end of planetary chaos. After the birth of the Aten and the Amarna period (approx. 17 years) cosmic chaos although continuing for at least another 7/800 years began to settle down allowing the planets to retreat to their present locations.
Now, the reason why large scarab beetles were produced by the cartload prior to the Amarna period is because Mars/Amenhotep came very close to earth and ‘he who has come into being' CAME INTO BEING numerous times over. Further, because Mars was drawn in closer to earth than previous encounters, the self manifested Khephri beetle appeared larger than normal, and as a result, the Egyptians produced larger scarabs.

I would also add Amenhotep III was given title ‘the dazzling sun disk of all lands.' I've yet to here anything close to a plausible explanation for such a title. I mean, how can any human being be described as a 'dazzling sun disk?' This is Mars/Amenhotep again, just prior to giving birth to its sold iron core; Mars/Amenhotep in the process of belching out the Aten and in doing so Mars/Amenhotep quite literally appearing as a ‘dazzling sun disk of all lands.' This definition requires no ‘shrugging of the shoulders,' no demoting the Egyptians as living in a bizarre world we don't understand, just real physical observations leading to apt and concise descriptions of planetary bodies in the guise of divine kings and queens.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The bindweeds of Egypt and their symbolic role for the deceased

http://www.egyptraveluxe.com/cairo_half_day_tour_to_cairo_egyptian_museum.php From the Middle Kingdom until the 18th Dynasty, representations are found of a parasitic bindweed associated with the stems of papyrus, . Its representations increase and refine themselves during the Amarnian period because of the naturalistic leaning to nature; but it is in Ramesside times, and more particularly that of Ramesses II, that the images become more beautiful and most detailed. The plant is frequently attached to the stem of the papyrus, or to bouquets, but being also able to, more rarely, exist separately. After the 20th Dynasty, if the theme persists, the quality of the representations decrease (as do all more representations of nature). This success under the Ramesseses is probably linked with the specific beliefs of that time, and notably the eminent place that the solar cults occupy. The nature of the plant has been under debate a long time ...

US authorities return eight stolen ancient Egyptian artifacts

US authorities agreed to return eight ancient Egyptian artifacts stolen and illegally smuggled out of the country. Today, upon his arrival from the United States, Minister of Antiquities Mohamed Ibrahim announced that US authorities agreed to return eight ancient Egyptian artefacts stolen and illegally smuggled out of the country. The objects are to arrive next month. The pieces include the upper part of a painted anthropoid wooden sarcophagus from the Third Intermediate period depicting a face of a woman wea ring a wig decorated with coloured flowers. Two linen mummy wrappings covered with plaster and bearing paintings showing winged amulets pushing the sun disc are also among the artefacts. Hieroglyphic text showing the name and titles of the deceased are also found on the plaster cover. The third piece is a cartonage painted mummy mask from the Third Intermediate period while the fourth and fifth items are Middle Kingdom wooden boats. The other three items are lim...

what exactly happened to the Sphinx's nose?

The Sphinx's Nose The nose of the Great Sphinx at Giza is made conspicuous by its absence. What happened to it? The popular story is that the troops of Napoleon Bonaparte used the nose for target practice in 1798. Drawings done for La Description de L'Egypte depict a noseless Sphinx. The Sphinx, 1743. In 1737, British traveler Richard Pococke visited Egypt and made a sketch of the Sphinx that was published six years later. The nose is shown intact, but Pococke likely exercised his poetic license by adding it when it was not there (earlier, in 1579, Johannes Helferich had further taken an artist's liberties by depicting the Sphinx with a nose -- and with decidedly female features). Frederick Lewis Norden, an artist and marine architect, also sketched the Sphinx in 1737. His detailed drawings, published in 1755, were more realistic and showed the Sphinx with no nose. It is very unlikely that Norden would omit the nose if it was present. We can conclude that the...